《雙城記》讀后感
讀完某一作品后，相信你一定有很多值得分享的收獲，讓我們好好寫份讀后感，把你的收獲和感想記錄下來吧。那么如何寫讀后感才能更有感染力呢？下面是小編精心整理的《雙城記》讀后感，歡迎大家借鑒與參考，希望對大家有所幫助。
《雙城記》讀后感1
These days I have read the well-known masterpiece A Tale of Two Cities. There are various roles in the book， and their relationship is amazing， which is unimaginabe.
The two cities mean England and Paris. The background of the novel is the big Revolution of France. The brutal Mrs.Defarge， innocent Charels， very kind Mr.Sydney Carden， and the devoted maiden gave me a deep impression.
I have a favorable impression about good persons while I hate the bad guys. Mr Carden was loyal to friends. He valued the sentiment among others. He fell in love with Lucy the first time he met her. Although Lucy refused him， his love for her was never changed. He even exchange himself for Lucy's husband to jail because he hoped Lucy would never be sad. This figure moved me so much.
《雙城記》讀后感2
As we all know， Charles Dickens' novel A Tale of Two Cities is a novelbased on the French Revolution in the late 1800s。 In that terrible time， everymoment was full of great fear。 Before that great revolution， the mon people，especially the peasants， were poor， hungry and unhappy。 The king and the noblemen maltreated the poor in many ways but they had never felt a little ashamed，on the contrary they thought they could do bad things in the nature ofthings。
As an outstanding writer， in Dickens's work， the language skill isessential。 Each kind of rhetoric technique， like the analogy， the exaggeration，the contrast， the humorous， and the taunt are handled skillfully and theartistry of the work is also delivered the peak。 A tale of two cities has itsdifference with the general historical novel， its character and the main plotare all fictionalizes。 With the broad real background of the French Revolution，the author take the fictional character Doctor Nanette’s experience as the mainclue， interweaves the unjust charge， love and revenge three independences butalso incident cross-correlation stories together， and the clue is plex。 Theauthor use narrates， foreshadowing， upholstery and so many techniques，causes the structure integrity and strictness， the plot winding anxious and richof theatrical nature， it displayed the remarkable artistic skill。 The style Atale of two cities is solemnity and melancholy， fills indignation， but l
acks the humor of the early works。
Besides， this novel criticizes the violence and oppression in the society。In this novel， the author not only expresses his humanitarianism on the lovebetween human beings， but also expresses his view according to his critics tothe violence and oppression in that society。 The author expresses his opinion ontwo parts。 First， he criticizes the aristocrats， esp。 the representative Marquisof Evremonde。 Second， he also criticizes the revolutionaries in the FrenchRevolution。 However， when we see from the description of the couple， the authordoes not think high of the revolution。 When the revolutionaries begin theirrevenge， the author describes that everyone is terrible， the man is terrible，the woman crazy， and there is not a human creature at that time。 We can seealthough the author does not show his agreement to the aristocrats’ cruelty， hedoes not like the bloody revolution， either。
What is more， this novel advocates the Christian love and self-sacrifice。Charles Dickens' novel A Tale of Two Cities is essentially a tale of love，sacrifice， and， most importantly， resurrection。 Dr。 Manette， Charles Darnay， andSydney Carton， all desperate men leading catastrophic lives， make greatsacrifices in order to attain true physical， spiritual， and societalresurrection for themselves and the ones they love。 In this novel， the authorportrays some typical characters that embody the author’s view。 First， heportrays some kind， upright and humane persons， such as Dr。 Manette， LucieManette， Mr。 Lorry， etc。 But at the same time， he also portrays some cruel andferocious persons， such as the Marquis of Evremonde Brothers， Mr。 and Mrs。Defarge。 He uses these characters to make a contrast， which clearly expresseshis view。 In short， what he was trying to express is that everyone can love eachother and sacrifice for others。 So Sydney Carton is the supreme embodiment o
f Charles Dickens’ humanitarianism。
Ultimately， A Taleof Two Cities is essentially a tale of love， sacrifice， and most importantly，resurrection。 Through personal sacrifices or sacrifices for those who theyloved， it shows the human’s virtue and integrity。 By struggling for， huntingfor， and sacrificing for a better life， all of the main characters are foreverresurrected in the hearts of those they love forever。
Overall， Charles Dickens is a humanitarian。 And according to the analysisof the characters in A Tales of Two Cities， we can see that the author advocatesthe universal love and equality between human beings。 And this is the basicelement in a peaceful and harmonious society。 Everyone should love people andonly the humanitarianism can improve this situation。 And A Tale of Two Cities isthe best work， which embodies his humanitarianism。 So that we can see thatCharles Dickens is an outstanding humanitarian of the capitalistic reformism inthe 19th century。
《雙城記》讀后感3
生命有兩座城，一個住著死亡。一個住著永生。
雖然《雙城記》是一本經典的小說，但因為其明確提出這段革命背景是法國，于是對革命的表現就被認為是作者的歷史觀。而這正是對小說無數爭議的焦點。狄更斯在小說中除了以細膩的筆墨展示了貴族的殘忍，同樣也展示了革命群眾非理性的破壞。他認為，革命是一種壓迫取代了另一種壓迫，一場直接濃重的血腥替代了另外一場血腥。對攻占巴士底獄以及對民眾的一系列描寫——血腥，殘忍，狡詐，惡毒是小說最為引人注目的地方。
狄更斯把在描寫暴民邪惡之處傾心了大量的筆墨，展示了他對暴民的痛恨，從某種層度上可以說是對革命的痛恨。當然，作為人道主義者的狄更斯也指出了拯救世界的良藥：愛。
我非常喜歡卡頓。實際上，卡頓就是狄更斯的化身，狄更斯正是首先想到了卡頓這個人和他身上的某種精神進而構思成這本小說的。小說中描述：“太陽悲悲切切，切切悲悲的冉冉升起，它所照見的'景物，沒有比這個人更慘的了。他富有才華，情感高尚，卻沒有施展才華流露情感的機會，不能有所作為，也無力謀取自己的幸福。他深知自己的癥結所在，卻聽天由命，任憑自己年復一年的虛度光陰，消耗殆盡。”
被自己遺棄的悲觀者——卡頓，在朋友遇到困難，在所鐘愛的女子的丈夫即將被送上斷頭臺時，他突然出現，被救人還不之所以的情況下，以自己的生命做代價，在緊要關頭使了個掉包計策救出了自己的所愛女子的丈夫。
這不正是基督之愛么，為自己贖了罪而消亡。事實上，小說中的卡頓也確實以圣經的口吻在臨死前說，“復活在我，生命在我，信我的人，雖然死了，也必復活；凡活著信我的人，必永遠不死。”這就是狄更斯為“最壞的時代”開出的良藥，然而這畢竟是一種理想。有人說，《雙城記》作為一部不朽的著作，如果沒有西德尼。卡頓的存在和所作所為，這部小說就失去了它的價值和光輝。我完全贊同。
也許，每個人的生命都有兩座城：一個住著死亡，一個住著永生。
《雙城記》讀后感4
Today, I finally read the book of two cities by the British writer Charles Dickens. After reading this book, I was in a long mood.
Novels in the 18th century French revolution as the background, the story will be in Paris, London, link up the two big cities, a narrative horse nate doctor is full of love and adventure, interspersed with the noble's cruelty, people's anger, trial spy... It mainly reveals the social order of the British and French in that period, and the life of the nobles and the ordinary people.
The book focuses on the fact that poor Dr Manette, who had been imprisoned in the bastille for 19 years by the aristocracy, had his daughter taken to live in England. In court, the father and daughter met the French nobleman darley and the poor master carton. Later, manette's daughter Lucy and darley married, and after ten years of happy family life, caton also gave Lucy a promise to make Lucy happy.
The people living in poor and helpless, cold and hunger, the plight of poor sickness repeatedly, suffered oppression, their hearts a backlog of deep and deep hatred of nobility, finally triggered the French revolution to overthrow the regime, for freedom. After the outbreak of the French revolution, darley went to France to defend his innocent servant, but he was arrested for being a French aristocrat. And carton, in order to make the promise of lucie's life happy, used him to be similar to darley, and, before he was sentenced to death, he replaced him with Dudley, and replaced him with the guillotine.
The dark ages have passed, the days of hope and light have come, and the darkness is terrible! At first, the world belongs to the king, and later, the world belongs to the people. On July 13, 1789, the people stormed the bastille, where political prisoners were held; On January 21, 1793, the revolution brought king Louis xvi to the guillotine, which symbolized the end of feudal rule. On 20 February 1793, the first republic of France was established.
The 18th century, full of darkness and oppression, is gone, and the miserable life of the people is over. We have ushered in the 21st century, which is to be bathed in hope, and the long years from that era to today are as brief as they were yesterday. I think that the spirit of carton is worthy of our study, he is affectionate, he keeps his promise, in order to fulfill his promise to Lucy, at all costs, including precious life.
The people of today will never let history repeat itself, nor will history repeat itself. Let us live each day and make our 21st century more glorious!
《雙城記》讀后感5
為了你，為了你所親愛的任何人，我愿意做任何事情。倘若我的生命中有值得犧牲的可能和機會，名人名言大全摘抄
我甘愿為你和你所愛的人們而犧牲。
——西德尼·卡爾頓
就這樣被感動了。它是一部波瀾壯闊的歷史，它是一個感人肺腑的故事，它更是一種純潔而高尚的愛。它就是狄更斯筆下的小說《雙城記》。全書充溢著撲朔迷離的色彩，作者以一連串引人入勝的故事為框架，以十八世紀法國大革命為背景。在黑暗的資本主義社會里，農民階級和工人階級忍受著資產階級無情的剝削。正如作者所說：“昌盛而又衰微，篤誠而又多疑，光明而又黑暗，這是充滿陽光期望的黎明，又是陰暗失望的長夜，人們擁有一切，卻兩手空空。”而主人公西德尼·卡爾頓、露西·曼內特和查爾斯·達爾內之間真摯的情感，成為這部名著亮麗的一筆。
在小說中，狄更斯成功地塑造了主要人物鮮明的個性。曼內特是個深愛女兒的.父親，在經歷磨難后仍寬容地把女兒嫁給仇人的兒子；露西是溫柔善良的賢妻良母，為了讓丈夫能看自己一眼每一天風雨不改地到大墻對面站立兩小時；查爾斯是個正直、豁達的貴族，與露西相愛，為了感情甘愿放下爵位與財產。
小說中還有一個人物，就是讓人有點憎惡的泰雷茲·德伐日。失去親人使她活著的唯一好處就是革命勝
利之時為親人報仇。但是等到革命勝利時，她許多年來夢寐以求的復仇卻失去了對象，她的憤怒之深是可
以想象的，然而為了發泄積憤卻拿侯爵兄弟的兒子及其家人抵罪，她走上了一條與那些偽貴族同樣殘忍的
道路，于是她的種種行為使她一步步失去了讀者的諒解。最后，惡人有惡報，她戲劇性地正因走火而
結束了自己充滿仇恨的一輩子。也許這才是她最佳的結局。那些像德伐日那樣以復仇為生活唯一目的的人，
即使命運坎坷，也決不能博得人們的同情。
而在整篇小說中，最讓我喜愛也是最令人感動的就是律師助手——西德尼·卡爾頓。他一出場就帶著一身憂郁，隱去了光芒，總是灰心、失望、冷漠、凄涼。他妥協于周圍環境，但有時卻又顯得格格不入，作為律師助手的他才華出眾，卻甘情緒愿躲在人后，做別人成功的墊腳石，他仿佛親手筑起了一堵墻，隔絕了名利、社會，默默地逗留在角落里。他與查爾斯長得十分相似，也同樣深愛著露西，然而兩者命運卻截然不一樣。他羨慕查爾斯，也恨他。可在經歷痛苦的煎熬后，他依舊帶著誠摯的祝福，愿露西與查爾斯永遠幸福，正因“愛比恨更為強有力得多”。這個表面上懶散、放縱的“無用之徒”，內心卻是崇高而純潔的。
最后，他向露西表達了自己的情感。每次讀起那段話，難免感到心酸，“我期望你知道你是我靈魂最后的夢。我是在墮落的生活中看見你和你的父親，還有你所經營的那個甜蜜的家，才恢復了我心中自以為早己死去的往日的夢想。我也因此才感到比任何時候都要凄涼可憐。自從我見到你以后，我才為一種原以為不會再譴責我的悔恨所苦惱。我聽到我以為早已永遠沉默的往日的聲音在悄悄地催我上進…………”
當查爾斯正因家族的犯罪而被無辜判決死刑，西德尼竟然代替他去斷頭臺理解行刑。在生命與愛之間，他選取了后者。他愛露西，為了她的幸福，他為她的愛人獻出自己的生命。當他走上斷頭臺的時候，面上依然持續著笑容，他信守對露西的諾言……正因，他的愛便是他的生命。此時此刻，我的腦海中想起了裴多菲的那首詩：“我愿意是急流/山里的小河/在崎嶇的路上/巖石上經過/只要我的愛人是一條小魚/在我的浪花中快樂地游來游去……”
盡管小說以一個意外的“大團圓”收場，但當讀者流著眼淚讀完該書時，卻感到無限的遺憾、心酸。有人說感情是自私的，但在狄更斯的小說《雙城記》中，我卻能深深地感受到一種超脫世俗的最純潔、最崇高的愛。它隱藏在內心深處，但卻無比的深厚；它默默地承受煎熬，為的只是使心愛的人幸福；它總是無私地付出，而不求一點兒的回報。這種愛在無形中上升到一個新境界，永恒地放著凄美而迷人的光彩。
“為了你，為了你所親愛的任何人，我愿意做任何事情。倘若我的生命中有值得犧牲的可能和機會，我甘愿為你和你所愛的人們而犧牲。”
《雙城記》讀后感6
"A tale of two cities" is one of Dickens's most important representative works. The novel profoundly exposed the society contradiction before the French Revolution, intensely attacks the aristocratic social class is dissolute and cruel, and sincerely sympathizes with the depressed classes. The novel also described many magnificent scenes like the revolt people attacked Bastille and so on, which displayed people's great strength.
The novel has portrayed many different people. Doctor Manette is honest and kind but suffers the persecution actually , Lucie is beautiful and gentle , Charles is graceful and noble, Lorry is upright and honest , Sydney is semblance of indifferent, innermost feelings of warm, unconventional but also selfless and lofty, Miss Pross is straightforward and loyal, Evremonde brothers are cruel and sinister…The plex hatred is hard to solve, the cruel revenge has made more hatreds, loves rebirth in the hell edge, but take the life as the price.
As an outstanding writer, in Dickens's work, the language skill is essential. Each kind of rhetoric technique, like the analogy, the exaggeration, the contrast, the humorous, and the taunt are handled skillfully, and the artistry of the work is also delivered the peak.
"A tale of two cities" has its difference with the general historical novel, its character and the main plot are all fictionalizes. With the broad real background of the French Revolution, the author take the fictional character Doctor Manette's experience as the main clue, interweaves the unjust charge, love and revenge three independences but also incident cross-correlation stories together, the plot is criss-crossed, and the clue is plex. The author use narrates, foreshadowing, upholstery and so many techniques, causes the structure integrity and strictness, the plot winding anxious and rich of theatrical nature, it displayed the remarkable artistic skill. The style "A tale of two cities" is solemnity and melancholy, fills indignantion, but lacks the humor of the early works.
《雙城記》讀后感7
查爾斯·狄更斯的《雙城記》篇幅并不長，但是，卻讀了半個月之久。實在是因為剛開始的時候，并沒有太讀懂，對于當時的時代背景，西歐的風俗習慣都不了解。直到現在，雖然已經讀到了結尾，其實對作者本身要表達的當時法國大革命的一些令人“廢解”的景象，并沒有更盡一步的了解。
但是通過對這部著作的學習，我有幾點需要思考的地方：
首先，是什么讓一個本該受人同情女人變成了讓讀者希望她早點死去的角色。泰雷茲·德伐日是個苦大仇深的人物，她為了復仇，甚至失去了作為普通人應有的憐憫之心，她不但把達爾內送上了斷頭臺，還要把本是受害者的曼內特醫生，以及達爾內的妻女也“斬草除根”。她的每次出現，她的言論，甚至讓人覺得瘋狂、可怕、恐懼，她給人帶來的是一種無可救藥的絕望。
其次，是什么讓民眾面對囚犯時先后能有截然不同的兩種態度。讓我吃驚的是，在第一次達爾內被捕時，當時的民眾在得知達爾內的“罪過”后，希望他馬上被處以死刑的急迫心情，和當法庭宣布他無罪時民眾們所表現出來的歡喜之情，形成了鮮明的對比，讓人無法理解。
再次，是什么讓一位本來欲自暴自棄過一輩子的人，為了所愛的人，竟然可以獻出了生命。西德尼·卡爾頓對愛情的執著讓人欽佩，他成了全書中最具靈魂的角色。所以把最后他的.話（作者認為他的想法會是這樣）抄錄在下：
“我看見巴薩、克萊、德伐日、復仇女神、陪審員、法官，一長串新的壓迫者從被這個懲罰工具所摧毀的老壓迫者們身上升起，又在這個懲罰工具還沒有停止使用前被消滅。我看見一座美麗的城市和一個燦爛的民族從這個深淵中升起。在他們爭取真正的自由的奮斗中，在他們的勝利與失敗之中，在未來的漫長歲月中，我看見這一時代的邪惡和前一時代的邪惡（后者是前者的自然結果）逐漸贖去自己的罪孽，并逐漸消失。
“我看見我為之獻出生命的人在英格蘭過著平靜、有貢獻、興旺、幸福的生活——我是再也見不到英格蘭了。我見到露西胸前抱著個以我命名的孩子。我看見露西的父親衰老了、背陀了，其它方面卻復了原，并以他的醫術踏實地濟世救人，過著平靜的生活。我看見他們的好友，那個善良的老人，在十年之后把他的財產贈送給了他們，并平靜地逝世，去接受主的報償。
“我看見我在他們和他們無數代后裔心里占有神圣的地位。我看見露西成了個龍鐘老婦，在我的祭日為我哭泣。我看見她跟她的丈夫正結束生命的歷程，并排躺在彌留的榻上。我知道他倆彼此在對方的靈魂中占有光榮崇高的地位，而我在他倆靈魂中的地位則更光榮、更崇高。
“我看見躺在她懷里的以我命名的孩子長大成人，在我曾走過的道路上奮勇前行。我看見他業績優異，以他的光耀使我的名字輝煌。我看見我染在那名字上的污跡消失。我看見他站在公平正直的法官和光明磊落的人們的最前列。我看見他帶了一個又以我命名的孩子來到這里。那時這里已是一片美景，全沒了今天的扭曲和丑惡。那孩子長了個我所熟悉的前額和一頭鑫發。我聽見他告訴我孩子我的故事，聲音顫抖，帶著深情。
“我現在已做的遠比我所做過的一切都美好；我將獲得的休息遠比我所知道的一切都甜蜜。”
“復活在我，生命也在我，信仰我的人雖然死了，也必復活；凡活著信仰我的人，必永遠不死。”（《圣經新約約翰福音》第十一章第二十五節。這是耶穌因乞丐拉撒路之死說的。其后耶穌來到拉撒路墓前，死去已四天的虔信耶穌的拉撒路果然復活，體現了“凡活著信仰我的人，必永遠不死”的意思。這句話是卡爾頓父親墓碑上的銘文。）
《雙城記》讀后感8
After reading "A tale of two cities"
"A tale of two cities" is one of Dickens's most important representative works.The novel profoundly exposed the society contradiction before the French Revolution,intensely attacks the aristocratic social class is dissolute and cruel,and sincerely sympathizes with the depressed classes.The novel also described many magnificent scenes like the revolt people attacked Bastille and so on,which displayed people's great strength. The novel has portrayed many different people. Doctor Manette is honest and kind but suffers the persecution actually , Lucie is beautiful and gentle ,Charles is graceful and noble,Lorry is upright and honest ,Sydney is semblance of indifferent, innermost feelings of warm,unconventional but also selfless and lofty,Miss Pross is straightforward and loyal,Evremonde brothers are cruel and sinister......The plex hatred is hard to solve, the cruel revenge has made more hatreds, loves rebirth in the hell edge,but take the life as the price. As an outstanding w
riter,in Dickens's work,the language skill is essential.Each kind of rhetoric technique,like the analogy,the exaggeration,the contrast,the humorous,and the taunt are handled skillfully,and the artistry of the work is also delivered the peak."A tale of two cities" has its difference with the general historical novel, its character and the main plot are all fictionalizes.With the broad real background of the French Revolution,the author take the fictional character Doctor Manette's experience as the main clue,interweaves the unjust charge, love and revenge three independences but also incident cross-correlation stories together,the plot is criss-crossed,and the clue is plex.The author use narrates,foreshadowing,upholstery and so many techniques,causes the structure integrity and strictness,the plot winding anxious and rich of theatrical nature,it displayed the remarkable artistic skill.the style "A tale of two cities" is solemnity and melancholy,fills indignantion,but lacks the
humor of the early works.
《雙城記》讀后感9
I believe that everyone who has seen a tale of two cities will be impressed by the shock. The book by dickens, a famous British writer, is immortal! Classic is classic, no matter how many years later, classics still sending out the bright luster, the ups and downs, what's more, the book story unimaginable a bizarre plot twists and turns, the master is the master, to make you know the story is fictional, but still as the story of the people and things, or moved, or anger, or sadness, or tears, don't you don't admire master ability of fiction.
Dickens in a tale of two cities revealed before the outbreak of the French revolution, the nobility of the ruthless oppression, depending on the masses of poor people mean dog, failure, and finally an outbreak of the French revolution, poor people after long-term brutal oppression, crazy revenge for the noble class, the same ruthless trial authority and the judgment of their lives, blood is blood, blinded by hate glasses, blood excited nerve, head to the ground, but vengeance will solve the problem? Can you live a happy life? This is the question dickens raised in his book. If the authorities have more compassion and more love for the people, so that everyone will not be oppressed, or the revolution will not break out, we must know that the working people's demands on society are very low and low! The revolution should be a warning to those in power. Worth fortunately, in the 20th century, we this s our authorities, whether China, wen jiabao, or Mr Obama in the United States, they are put forward for all to common prosperity, let everyone enjoy the fruit of social and economic development, they think that favor the rich society not only moral, also a serious threat to social stability.
Love and tolerance is the good idea, because saw a pair of noble brother destroyed the crimes of a poor family, was framed in the bastille 18 years of doctor, doctor angry in prison, he secretly recorded the persecuted, vowed to heaven and earth, accused of aristocrats and their children and grandchildren, until the last one, in the years of imprisonment, the doctor lost his head, do the shoes has become the only sustenance to sustain life. After his release from prison, his father returned to his senses with his daughter's deep love for his father. With great love and tolerance, he agreed to the marriage of his daughter.
When with a picture of the ceiling look up court appearance of Mr. Carlton, gives the impression of how unruly and arrogant, although he talented, although he has a heart of precious, but because of the darkness of the society, he chose the debauchery, chose the cynicism, chose the ceremony, Carlton love Lucy how pure and selfless, he chose when Lucy happiness silently blessing, secretly guardian beside her, when Lucy need a bailout, he chose to his own life in exchange for Lucy her husband's life, to ensure the happiness of Lucy, although I do not believe that the world really can have such feelings, but I still deep compassion, pity, Carlton, great respect for his feelings, hope all tender belong to him, to comfort his wounded heart.
The children who were persecuted by the aristocrats, the hatred of the heart, the revenge became the knife axe, the symbol of the vengeance, the death of the goddess of vengeance is not a metaphor for the price of revenge?
Hatred, tolerance, love! This all let us deeply ponder introspection! Carlton's words are supposed to be all the best footnote: this age of sin, and bring forth the previous era of nature of sin to offset by themselves, and gradually disappeared, a beautiful peace loving era will be born!
After reading the story, do you still have jingling shoes in your mind? Still in the doctor's gloom, sad helplessness and tears of anger? Still in tears for carton? Still sighing for madame Defarge? I think you must be in the doctor family finally happy peace and silent blessing!
《雙城記》讀后感10
個在人類歷史上留下了血的印證的不可磨滅的悲慘時代，猜疑、仇恨、惶恐、屠掠的瘋狂侵略下人心惶惶。“既然死亡是大自然用來消除萬物的靈丹妙藥”，那么，在這個混亂的時代，各式各樣的死刑無疑是統治者們“清洗”這場由大革命所帶來的陰影的“最好利器”。
狄更斯在小說中以細膩的筆墨展示了貴族的殘忍與革命群眾非理性的破壞。透過貴族與平民之間的仇恨沖突，讓我們看到，鮮血無法洗去仇恨，殺戮無法平定動亂，更不能替代愛。
在這矛盾、冗亂的時代下，狄更斯成功塑造了西德尼。卡頓——“他富有才華，情感高尚，卻沒有施展才華流露情感的機會，不能有所作為，也無力謀取自己的幸福。他深知自己的癥結所在，卻聽天由命，任憑自己年復一年的虛度光陰，消耗殆盡”。 西德尼。卡頓的存在是一場幸福的悲劇，他孤獨，他憂郁，他用冷漠的外表面對世間百態，他用“若無其事”杜絕身邊的名與利，他愛上了露西，卻不愿去追求，他的善良讓他擔心露西會因他墮落，當他最終他向露西表達了愛情，令人動容。
“為了你，為了你所愛的任何人，我愿意作任何事情。倘若我的生涯中有值得犧牲的可能和機會，我甘愿為你和你所愛的人們而犧牲。”——西德尼。卡頓
我以為，這樣的愛是廣義的，如夢幻般偉大而純凈，催人淚下，它默默承受著煎熬，“孤獨”面對著酷刑，它也許憂傷但充滿幸福，它可能凄美但并不單薄，在無形中，放出動人光彩，成為經典。卡頓如同黑暗里的精靈，像是“星星之火”點燃真愛，
卡頓的離開平靜且從容，但我明白，走想向愛的祭壇，不光靠勇氣，更珍貴的.只那一份感人肺腑的“博愛”！也許卡頓的犧牲正是一種重生，因為他在坦然中透過了死亡看到了希望，看到了未來。
我想，如果狄更斯用大革命下的世間百態，人性萬千堆砌起了《雙城記》的血肉，那他就用西德尼。卡頓鑄造了《雙城記》的靈魂。也許遺憾，也許辛酸，更多是祝愿與感動——最純凈，最永恒的愛，像永不凋零的春天永遠鮮活的存在。
《雙城記》讀后感11
那是最完美的時代，那是最糟糕的時代;那是智慧的年頭，那是愚昧的年頭;那是信仰的時期，那是懷疑的時期;那是光明的季節，那是黑暗的季節;那是期望的春天，那是失望的冬天;我們全都在直奔天堂，我們全都在直奔相反的'方向--簡而言之，那時跟此刻十分相象，某些最喧囂的權威堅持要用形容詞的最高級來形容它。說它好，是最高級的;說它不好，也是最高級的。
這是整本書的開頭第一章，將全書的基調定上了杯具色彩，然而就在這矛盾的時代中，也確實存在過光明。
這本書敘述了法國大革命時期圍繞在醫生馬奈特一家周圍的事，這本書顛覆了我對自由，權利以及善惡的看法——法國人民不堪重負，推翻了波旁王朝，然而新政權建立之后朝他們走來的難道是他們心馳神往的自由嗎?不，仍然是以往的提心吊膽，稍不留神明天就會被送上斷頭臺。得勢之后的德發日太太濫用職權，將死敵們個個置于死地，最后卻落得個慘死的下場。正如那句話所說的：“自由啊，有多少罪惡是假借你的名義干出來的。”大革命并不如想象中的那么完美，而是以暴易暴。它沒有拯救人民，而是將人民推入了另一個火坑。
再來看看另外一位大革命的犧牲品——達內，革命前，他放下了國內的家業，只身來到英國謀生，在他看來，壓迫人民是一件極不人道的事，然而，革命爆發后，他反而無辜地成為人民的敵人，大家不分青紅皂白地要將他領上斷頭臺。但是堅信在九死一生之后，他依然是原先那個善良的達內。
而卡頓——一個才華橫溢卻自甘墮落的律師，他與達內有著相同的長相，卻有著不一樣的命運，在應對活著還是讓自己心愛的人得到幸福的抉擇時，毅然決然的選取了后者，在他看來，生命在愛的面前是微不足道的，即使在斷頭臺上，他也表現出了令人難以想象的沉著冷靜。正因在他的心底，一向有一個信念在支持他：“耶穌說，復活在我，生命也在我，信我的人，雖然死了，也必復活。凡活著信我的人，必永遠不死。”他用死完成了自我救贖，他用死來反抗虛偽的革命者，他用死來詮釋對露絲的愛。生命，成了他最后的武器，愛，成了他唯一的支柱。
《雙城記》讀后感12
As we all know， Charles Dickens' novel A Tale of Two Cities is a novel based on the French Revolution in the late 1800s. In that terrible time， every moment was full of great fear. Before that great revolution， the mon people， especially the peasants， were poor， hungry and unhappy. The king and the noble men maltreated the poor in many ways but they had never felt a little ashamed， on the contrary they thought they could do bad things in the nature of things.
As an outstanding writer， in Dickens's work， the language skill is essential. Each kind of rhetoric technique， like the analogy， the exaggeration， the contrast， the humorous， and the taunt are handled skillfully and the artistry of the work is also delivered the peak. A tale of two cities has its difference with the general historical novel， its character and the main plot are all fictionalizes. With the broad real background of the French Revolution， the author take the fictional character Doctor Nanette’s experience as the main clue， interweaves the unjust charge， love and revenge three independences but also incident cross-correlation stories together， and the clue is plex. The author use narrates， foreshadowing， upholstery and so many techniques， causes the structure integrity and strictness， the plot winding anxious and rich of theatrical nature， it displayed the remarkable artistic skill. The style A tale of two cities is solemnity and melancholy， fills indignation， but l
acks the humor of the early works.
Besides， this novel criticizes the violence and oppression in the society. In this novel， the author not only expresses his humanitarianism on the love between human beings， but also expresses his view according to his critics to the violence and oppression in that society. The author expresses his opinion on two parts. First， he criticizes the aristocrats， esp. the representative Marquis of Evremonde. Second， he also criticizes the revolutionaries in the French Revolution. However， when we see from the description of the couple， the author does not think high of the revolution. When the revolutionaries begin their revenge， the author describes that everyone is terrible， the man is terrible， the woman crazy， and there is not a human creature at that time. We can see although the author does not show his agreement to the aristocrats’ cruelty， he does not like the bloody revolution， either.
What is more， this novel advocates the Christian love and self-sacrifice. Charles Dickens' novel A Tale of Two Cities is essentially a tale of love， sacrifice， and， most importantly， resurrection. Dr. Manette， Charles Darnay， and Sydney Carton， all desperate men leading catastrophic lives， make great sacrifices in order to attain true physical， spiritual， and societal resurrection for themselves and the ones they love. In this novel， the author portrays some typical characters that embody the author’s view. First， he portrays some kind， upright and humane persons， such as Dr. Manette， Lucie Manette， Mr. Lorry， etc. But at the same time， he also portrays some cruel and ferocious persons， such as the Marquis of Evremonde Brothers， Mr. and Mrs. Defarge. He uses these characters to make a contrast， which clearly expresses his view. In short， what he was trying to express is that everyone can love each other and sacrifice for others. So Sydney Carton is the supreme embodiment o
f Charles Dickens’ humanitarianism.
Ultimately， A Tale of Two Cities is essentially a tale of love， sacrifice， and most importantly， resurrection. Through personal sacrifices or sacrifices for those who they loved， it shows the human’s virtue and integrity. By struggling for， hunting for， and sacrificing for a better life， all of the main characters are forever resurrected in the hearts of those they love forever.
Overall， Charles Dickens is a humanitarian. And according to the analysis of the characters in A Tales of Two Cities， we can see that the author advocates the universal love and equality between human beings. And this is the basic element in a peaceful and harmonious society. Everyone should love people and only the humanitarianism can improve this situation. And A Tale of Two Cities is the best work， which embodies his humanitarianism. So that we can see that Charles Dickens is an outstanding humanitarian of the capitalistic reformism in the 19th century.
《雙城記》讀后感13
“那個時代同現今這個時代竟然如此惟妙惟肖。”雙城，是英國和法國。
“雙城”，是貴族與雅克。又是一本初讀幾個篇章覺得枯燥乏味，但越往后就越欲罷不能了，感覺像品果酒，后勁很強。他可以在前面穿插著各種你所不理解的情節，然后用一根根分明的線將他們連成一副世界名畫。你能從組成那畫的各個部分品茗出不同的小畫，跟香水的前調中調后調相似，每一部分都讓你擁有不同的味道。
又很像品茶，最后留得余味久久不能散去，還很想再坐下嘬個一口，砸吧砸吧嘴再繼續沉浸到那略苦卻又令人無法抗拒的味道里。由著馬奈特大夫的事情引開，那困擾著老人的“足音”一遍一遍地敲打著他的耳朵，然后開始敲打著他女兒丈夫的耳朵，他女兒的耳朵。最后那令人恐懼的“足音”終于消失了，隨著那個以血澆灌“吉洛汀”女士的人的消失而永遠消失了。
那一天永遠過去了。（“十二點永遠過去了。”）
讀到最后，我在想，雅克們的革命是為了讓時代更好嗎？他們如何知道所處的時代是比以前好的呢？是因為可以隨意審處他人？還是因為自己手里捏著可以隨意斬頭的武器？可以不分青紅皂白的舉報，還是可以不顧善惡的奪取一個人的性命（盡管這個人是無辜的）？
在貴族的時代，他們覺得自己的時代是最好的，而雅克們覺得那個時代是最壞的。在雅克的時代，他們覺得自己的時代是最好的，而貴族們覺得那個時代是最壞的。
所以，“那一長串從舊的壓迫者毀滅消亡的廢墟上興起的新壓迫者”，并不是沒有原因的。不自由，平等，博愛毋寧死的口號到最后產生了一具具無辜的'尸體，所以羅蘭夫人才會在死前喊出：“自由，多少罪惡假汝之名進行。”
但盡管如此，每個時代都有逆流而上的英雄和真正的勇士。我喜歡卡屯，是崇拜的那種喜歡，也夾雜著他對露茜的那種喜歡。他的出場并不怎么精彩，大家好像都不怎么喜歡這個人，覺得他沒有出息，他自己也是這么覺得的。他好像在遇見露茜之前，不知道自己的前路是什么，未來在哪里。遇見之后，他便知道了，也履行了自己當初對露茜許下的約定。
“耶穌說，復活在我，生命也在我；信我的人，雖然死了，也必復活；凡活著信我的人，必永遠不死。”——基督教安葬禱文
他送給了他自己。
看到最終章的時候，悲傷好像從四面八方涌來，沖開了那道叫做“情緒”的門。剛好有個比較有意思的事情，我的臺燈好像在應景一般，隔著三五八分鐘滅一次，不到十秒又亮起來，像是卡屯用摩斯電碼給我傳遞他的心情。
“我現在做的是一樁大好事情，遠遠勝過我一向所作所為。我現在去的是一處大好歸宿，遠遠勝過我一向所知所解。”巧，我寫讀后感的時候臺燈又開始明明滅滅了。
《雙城記》讀后感14
《雙城記》是美國最偉大的作家之一——查爾斯·狄更斯寫的。他1812年出生于普茨茅斯，1870年去世。他出身貧寒，但在不幸的童年過后，他很快便變得富有和成功。他還寫過好多著名小說，如：《霧都孤兒》。《遠大前程》等等。
《雙城記》主要是記載了1775年，在巴黎的一家酒館的樓上的一間屋子里坐著一位白發男人，他正忙著做鞋。他曾在巴士底獄當了18年的囚徒。現在他已是一個自由人了，然而他卻不知道自己的名字，也人不吃他的朋友。他所知道的就是他必須繼續做鞋。
在一輛去巴黎的車上坐著路茜，這是她從未見過面的女兒。路茜把她父親帶回了倫敦，在女兒的愛心和照料之下，他忘掉了過去并學會了沖向一個自由人那樣去生活。
然而在法國大革命的暴風雨年代，過去既沒有消失也沒有被忘記。于是不久的危險秘密地把路茜和她所愛的人們帶回了巴黎……那兒恐怖的死亡機器——斷頭臺正饑餓的等待著法蘭西的敵人們。
這里的主人公很顯然就是揭穿了當時社會的黑暗和腐敗。一個原來當了18年的囚徒，什么也不記得的男人，最后又被自己從未見過面的`女兒路茜帶回了倫敦，開始了一個自由人的生活，但最終他的女兒和她所愛的人們都回到了黑暗的巴黎，被法蘭西的敵人們處死了！
《雙城記》讀后感15
A Love and Hate in A Tale of Two Cities Many have grown fond of the taleinvolving the noble， former Fr ench aristocrat， who had virtually unmatched(except maybe in boo ks) good fortune。 First， his life was saved by the pitifultestimony of a beautiful young woman。 Anyone would gladly have married th isbeautiful too-good-to-be-true-woman he wedded。 It is later seen， however， thatthis man should have married her even if she were u gly as sin。 This was not thecase though， and he married a beautif ul woman， who had an admirer who was adead ringer for her hus band， was a loser， and would give his life to keep herfrom pain， all of which really es in handy when her hubby is on his way to theguillotine。 This is not the story of a man with multiple gua rdian angels， butrather that of a character in Charles Dickens' nove l A Tale of Two Cities。 Askeptic could easily see this as an unbe lievable， idealistic and overratednovel that is too far-fetched。 An u nbiased reader， however， can see
that this is a story of love and ha te， each making up the bare-bones ofthe novel so that one must l ook closely to see Dickens' biases， attempts atpersuasion， and unbe lievable plot-lines， some of which are spawned fromDickens' love and hate， and some of which love and hate are used to develop。
The more lifeless of the characters we are supposed to like--the Ma nettes，Darnay， Lorry-- play their parts in the idyllic fashion Dicken s and like-mindedreaders want， a fashion made inflexible by circu mstances and purposes。"Circumstances and purposes" refers in larg e part to Dickens' state of mind andobjective。 Dickens' intrusive， u nusually editorial point of view， withreferences to "I" and deviatio ns from narration for monologue， reveals thenovel's slavery to the teachings of his morals--or perhaps his own slavery tothe morals o f his time and Protestantism。 Therefore， can Lucie be any differentfrom the supportive， wholly feminine wife and mother she is? Not if Dickens' isto stick to his obligation， or perhaps obstinate purpos e， of moral teachings。With that aside， what is to be said of Dickens' teaching， his presen tation oflove and hate? They both have one thing in mon: the characters representing eachare unmistakable at a mile away。 The moment Lucie Manette is put before
the reader's eyes， her tumblin g blond locks， her bright blue eyes， herseventeen-year-old， slight， p retty (but not sexy!) figure and all， he knowsthat， not only will sh e not be a villainous， unlikable character， but she willbe the epito me of the good， beautiful woman (and later housewife)， the one Dickens thought every women should be。 At this young woman's intr oduction withMr。 Lorry， she curtseys to him， and Dickens wastes
no time in pointing out that "young ladies made curtseys in those days"。The introductory scene climaxes at fair Lucie's fainting， one that， to some，puts her unflawed position into question， although to Dickens， it reinforces it。At the other side of this moral lecture are the Defarges。 Call Dicke ns a masterfor embodying qualities， but here are another flawless pair--flawlessly evil，and sentenced to evil from the moment we see Madame Defarge's "watchful eye thatseldom seemed to look at a nything， a large hand heavily ringed， a steady face，strong features， and great posure of manner"， a stark contrast to the slight，fai nting figure of Mada-- or rather， Miss Manette。 To further turn us againstgood old Madame Defarge， Dickens has her using a toothpi ck publicly in heropening scene， an activity dainty Miss Manette wouldn't dream of。 Finally， wemustn't forget the setting。 Lucie ma y have been born in France， but shedefected to England， and trave led from London to meet Mr。 Lorr
y。 Madame Defarge was a Frenc hwoman， born and living amongst peasants whodrank wine scoope d off of mud。 She probably was not taught Dickens' (and hisprima ry English audience's) Protestant morals in her Catholic nation， andcertainly did not manifest them。
In arguably the book's first touching scene (some say it's the one whereCarton is on his way to the guillotine)， Lucie goes through much trouble to coaxher father from his insanity， laying her head on his shoulder， and trusting aman she had never met。 When Mad ame Defarge sought vengeance for the cruelinjustice mitted ag ainst her kin， she looked to destroy not only the innocentdescende nt of the culprit， but his family-- an old man， a young woman， an d alittle girl。 These two characters' love and hate are unconditional and total。Did this have to be so? Could not Madame Defarge ha ve showed one bit offemininity， of human kindness? Could Lucie not have stolen a contemptuous glanceat her persecutors? Not with Dickens at the helm。 Lucie and Defarge are createdwith a convic tion， and once Dickens' plot was laid， the blinders he put on hisc haracters allowed only one route。 Perhaps it was a primitive style， but moderncharacters are painted more realistically， with human w eaknesses and
more variability。 Did it have to be so? Could Dicken s have captured morereaders， especially in the long run， if he had pursued more varying actions inhis characters， as well as more h umanness and believability? Does this point toDickens as a flawed writer， with little imagination and ability? Another factorthat must be considered is our inability to criticize a n English--orEnglish-living--character， or to find a modicum of res
pectability in a French one， with two exceptions。 One is the young womanwho is beheaded just before Sydney Carton。 She is the en emy of an enemy， she isgoing to be killed， and she allows Dicke ns to teach another moral using SydneyCarton。 Why not have her happy to die for the benefit of her countrymen， whilenot trembling as she ascends to her death， thereby depriving the mon enemy of asmall victory? With the modern trend of political correctness and anti-racism， aTale of Two Cities written today would never le ave the word processor。 JerryCruncher is about the most sinful of the English (aside from a spy but，remember， he defected to Franc e)， and he repents by the end， which counts foranother moral fro m Dickens。 In Dickens' time， racism was not regarded as it istoda y， and so if he wanted to use the French Revolution to send a me ssage tothe population， it was his right， but he may have taken thi s too far for some。Today， Lucie Manette would by no means be taken seriously as
a believable， even likable character。 She persists in fainting at particularly stressful moments， but when her husband is before a heartless， bloodthirstyjury， she looks brave and strong just for him。 In cont ext， this was a screamingcontradiction， but one that Dickens requir ed to portray his Eve。 It is mucheasier to believe Madame Defarg e's hate than her opposition's love。 Defarge'ssister was raped and
murdered mercilessly and her brother was killed by a pair heartless"noblemen"。 It is much easier to understand Defarge's taste for blo od than thecondition of Manette， who， after practicing as a pet ent doctor and actingnormally for years， experiences a recurrence of his mental condition simplybecause his wonderful daughter has left for two weeks， although he has two dearfriends nearby。 Charles Dickens has built an enduring story enjoyed by millions，w hich is loved by experts and critics today although it would be im mediatelybutchered if written by a modern author。 It is a love stor y loved by itscreator， but wholly unbelievable。 It is actually doom ed by its own idealism andunrealistic characters。 As a hate story， i t is much more petent， although alsousing this for its own pur poses。 One can draw one's own conclusions and ideasfrom such a book， but facts are facts。
【《雙城記》讀后感】相關文章：
《雙城記》讀后感02-05
雙城記的讀后感04-08
雙城記讀后感03-28
《雙城記》讀后感10-09
雙城記讀后感10-05
雙城記的讀后感10-07
狄更斯的《雙城記》讀后感04-08
有關雙城記讀后感10-05
《雙城記》讀后感作文10-06